Lawyers for investigative journalist, Anas Aremeyaw Anas – Cromwell Gray LLP say media reports suggesting that the Supreme Court has ordered Anas to testify in court with his mask off in the case against former President of the Ghana Football Association, Kwesi Nyantakyi must be disregarded.

The Supreme Court, presided over by Justice Baffoe-Bonnie, in its ruling on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, stated that the celebrated investigative journalist should appear in court and testify publicly as a prosecution witness.

But the Judge’s decision has largely been misinterpreted, with many saying Anas is to come to court without his mask if he so desires to be the witness.

This, the lawyers, in a statement, said is untrue and must be treated with contempt.

“The public should disregard false reportage that Anas has been ordered by the Supreme Court or is being compelled by the Supreme Court to appear in court without his trademark face beads”, Anas’ legal team stressed.

They added that “Anas may choose to testify as a prosecution witness or not.”

The High Court granted an oral application by the prosecution in the criminal case of Kwesi Nyantakyi for Anas Aremeyaw Anas to give evidence in-camera as a prosecution witness.

The decision of the court was challenged by lawyers of Kwesi Nyantakyi who filed a certiorari application at the Supreme Court.

In their application, the lawyers, led by Thadeus Sory, argued that the order of the High Court offended the human rights of the applicant as guaranteed under the 1992 Constitution and that the order was made without regard to the procedures and rules of the court which required that a formal and not an oral application be made in such circumstances.

They further added that the order of the court was made in excess of jurisdiction of the court.

Nyantakyi’s lawyers insisted that the High Court’s ruling was erroneous and prayed the Supreme Court to allow the investigative journalist’s testimony to be public.

Background